Timeline for Spurt in Close Votes
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2018 at 9:34 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Apr 14, 2018 at 1:32 | answer | added | DukeZhouMod | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 14, 2018 at 0:57 | comment | added | DukeZhou Mod | Unless a post is egregious, and clearly off-topic, I try to follow Ben N's lead on closure, since he's been modding here the longest. But it's rare a day passes when I don't have at least 1 close vote in my queue. I think, because we're still Beta, and still defining ourselves, the close votes can be taken as dissenting opinions on the scope of this Stack. It's good for us to get those opinions, but in general, we seem to prefer leniency. (I personally prefer to try and salvage questions, as opposed to closing.) | |
| Apr 13, 2018 at 12:22 | comment | added | Ben N Mod | @Pheo As far as I know, the system does not have any knowledge of site standards. Questions are never pushed into Close Votes without a human thinking it should be closed, but for what it's worth, there are some text heuristics that push things into Low Quality Posts. | |
| Apr 13, 2018 at 12:14 | answer | added | MithicalMod | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 13, 2018 at 11:55 | comment | added | FreezePhoenix | Could someone give me specs on this: "Chance that the system has detected that standards are changing" | |
| Apr 13, 2018 at 11:46 | comment | added | FreezePhoenix | I have made a total of 0 close votes. Just saying. And if you look at the questions, there are 0 flags towards closing. Odds are it does have something to do with me indirectly, though... | |
| Apr 13, 2018 at 10:38 | history | asked | user9947 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |