Timeline for 13 out of the 15 questions on the front page right now are -1 or lower score: This site needs a broader scope or it's doomed
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 18, 2017 at 22:21 | comment | added | Ben N Mod | @Viziionary With a site this small, it's definitely possible for one or a handful of people to greatly affect the front page. If you like, you can help implement our scope by voting up good, on-topic questions. | |
May 18, 2017 at 20:40 | comment | added | J.Todd | (cont) or the scope is too narrow. If it's one of the former two possibilities, that's going to discourage and drive away potential members at a time when the community desperately needs to grow. If the scope is too narrow, that's a whole different beast to tackle. I'm new here, I can't yet say which one it is. Your guess will be a lot better than mine. | |
May 18, 2017 at 20:39 | comment | added | J.Todd | I think this subject matter is so new, industrially speaking, that it's like the early days of programming - you don't have a huge saturation of experts in the general population yet. Those who are experts are highly sought after and likely very busy. That's going to be a long running problem for the next few years while programmers start to take that leap to understanding AI. However, that being said, 13 out of 15 questions being down-voted to -1 or lower makes it clear that there's a problem: Either someone is serial down-voting, someone doesnt understand the scope or disagrees, or | |
May 18, 2017 at 19:59 | history | answered | Ben NMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |